2 ms·
That distinction is obvious to some people, and obviously invalid to others. In a gender-laden way. Which is the point of the article.
by spenrose 12y ago
That distinction is obvious to some people, and obviously invalid to others. In a gender-laden way. Which is the point of the article.
- wyager 12y ago>That distinction is obvious to some people, and obviously invalid to others. Anyone who doesn't see the distinction and complains about Wikipedia's inaptitude as a social network shouldn't be editing wikipedia. Information sources shouldn't have to pander to <insert demographic> just for the sake of attracting users of <insert demographic>.