4 ms·
A fair number of VCs perform back-channel references (references the candidate didn't provide) and the main reason for that is to filter out anyone who's ever s
by michaelochurch 12y ago
A fair number of VCs perform back-channel references (references the candidate didn't provide) and the main reason for that is to filter out anyone who's ever suffered from depression or anxiety.
Large firms are in on this discrimination, too. It's illegal to ask about these disorders when hiring, but if you acqui-hire from investors who legally can probe into those questions, it's a nice little loop-hole.
I don't think it really does any good, because all else being equal, I'd want to a person of good character who fought a mental disability and beat it. That's not easy to do. Beating depression or bipolar or panic disorder is way harder (and says more about a person's fortitude) than building Snapchat. The truth is that many people with mental illnesses are far above normal in functionality when not affected.
Still, this is just another thing that is changing in Silicon Valley. The old Silicon Valley (HP, not Snapchat) driven forward by passionate, creative people and many had these illnesses. The new one (Snapchat, Clinkle) is all about image management and favors low-variance, reliable mediocrities.
- maxerickson 12y agoYou assume the VCs are good at spotting depression and anxiety. It doesn't seem obvious to me that this is the case.
- michaelochurch 12y agoI don't assume that they're good at it. I know that they try to do it, and what their methods are. I think their methods are, at best, modestly effective and, even with that, it's not clear that selecting against low-level (and usually manageable with age) mental health issues has any value, and it just might be counterproductive (antifragility argument here).