4 ms·
1 dot = 1 person. Zooming in and out doesn't expose any particularly bad distortion of the underlying data at the lower zoom levels. It seems to work really we
by lttlrck 12y ago
1 dot = 1 person. Zooming in and out doesn't expose any particularly bad distortion of the underlying data at the lower zoom levels.
It seems to work really well to me, is there region in particular where you see a problem?
- Groxx 12y agoecdavis notices this inconsistency: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8303845 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8303845 plus has a second source to back it up. Otherwise, just look around at densely populated areas. Like this asian-heavy area: http://cl.ly/image/1z0Q1T1V2V0N http://cl.ly/image/1z0Q1T1V2V0N (edit 2: turned off smoothing, that's actual pixels) note that immediately-surrounding areas have blue dots, but not that one. Meanwhile, you can see less than one dot sized dots for orange and blue poking out, but no orange or blue complete dots on top of the red. Look at other dense areas, you'll see the same thing - some colors are exclusively on top of others, and it's always the same ones. (edit: for context, that block is in the middle here, in San Francisco: http://cl.ly/image/3m3N3f423S0M http://cl.ly/image/3m3N3f423S0M) There isn't enough room for them to have fit one person per pixel, so they're stacked (somewhat). This favors the ones stacked on top.