4 ms·
You've called cyclists morons and insisted cycling on roads is equivalent with deliberately attempting to injure other people. There is absolutely nothing "humo
by nknighthb 12y ago
You've called cyclists morons and insisted cycling on roads is equivalent with deliberately attempting to injure other people. There is absolutely nothing "humorous" about that, nor your inability to understand why other people found it horrifying and not conducive to discussion.
I don't care how much you talk about dedicated cycling infrastructure. Your violent "metaphor" overshadows it, and taints it, revealing an underlying purpose of simple segregation of something that enrages you. You've also claimed negative experiences with cyclists as a pedestrian, which, given the circumstances, is simply an admission of even greater bias against cycling.
I told you you were being an asshole in hopes that you might recognize that you've gone way off the deep end. But apparently you're a lost cause.
My fault, I should have already known that -- I did some searching and realized you're the same guy who rages about cycling every time it comes up on HN.
So, yeah, sorry to have interrupted your ravings.
- bane 12y agoConsidering your lack of basic reading comprehension of my statements and metaphor and the repeated insults I've received in this thread and others, I feel like my opinion of cyclists is even more justified. Please continue lecturing me and others how we should be respectful of others while calling them dangerous and demented.