3 ms·

That isn't a response to the question I asked; can you address the question? And even the scenario you presented here is hardly the summary execution that you

• trhway 12y ago
  >And even the scenario you presented here is hardly the summary execution that you listed as a fact previously; can you address that discrepancy? the dog was given up as the alternative was for it to be ultimately taken away by Animal Control and probably euthanized there - the only difference here is technical details - you mentioned shooting in your house and they use injection on their premises.
  • CocaKoala 12y ago
    That still isn't a response to the question I asked; can you address that question? And choosing an animal to be given up and taken to a shelter and possibly euthanized is nowhere near the same and shooting an animal on the premises. And again, that's a city-level ordinance, not a governmental one; it in no way applies to everybody, so I don't know why you're presenting it as inarguable fact. Edit: Honestly, the fact that I need to ask a question three times when it was very clearly laid out indicates that you're just ignoring it, which I can only assume means you don't actually have an answer. If you're interested in actually having a discussion instead of just saying foolish things and refusing to back them up, then please address my question; otherwise, you've got some pretty messed up and honestly harmful ideas that you're proposing here and I hope you're never in a position to enforce your beliefs on anything else.