I know this has been brought up before, but I'd like to toss in my two cents. For HN posts that link to paywalled articles, I would like to suggest a [paywall]

I know this has been brought up before, but I'd like to toss in my two cents. For HN posts that link to paywalled articles, I would like to suggest a [paywall] tag be appended to the title. This will indicate that for someone like me, who doesn't subscribe to The Economist, I would have better luck skipping the link itself and instead going straight to the HN comments, where (hopefully) a user with access to the full text will be kind enough to post a brief summary. (Presumably, the OP should have access, and I would like to gently suggest that it should be he or she who writes the summary.) I would also like to suggest that if you notice a post with a [paywall] tag, and someone has gone to the trouble of summarizing it, you vote that person up even if you would ordinarily not take the trouble. Finally, I would like to suggest that these summaries self-identify not as tl;dr (too long; didn't read) but te;dr (too expensive; didn't read).