3 ms·
> I can understand not allowing me to post anonymously - but to go as far as refusing me read access? Really? Read access still consumes resources - you may wa
by ad_hominem 12y ago
> I can understand not allowing me to post anonymously - but to go as far as refusing me read access? Really?
Read access still consumes resources - you may want to read up on what "denial of service" means and check your outrage. CloudFlare sits between you and the host server, and it's their responsibility to cut off DoS attacks before it can affect the host server. Their heuristics may not be perfect but it's not exactly a simple problem to solve.
- AnthonyMouse 12y ago> Read access still consumes resources - you may want to read up on what "denial of service" means and check your outrage. CloudFlare sits between you and the host server, and it's their responsibility to cut off DoS attacks before it can affect the host server. Their heuristics may not be perfect but it's not exactly a simple problem to solve. It's hardly rocket science to determine when a DoS attack is occurring based on the overall traffic level. And until it is there is no need for countermeasures.
- doctorfoo 12y agoBlocking of read access is not something I've often experienced before, and certainly not at this scale. Usually it's just one admin blocking an IP here and there, but now, with this job outsourced... To be able to impede an IP from accessing such a huge swathe of sites is a unique and new innovation, and a scary centralisation of power. The ability to block threats is far greater, sure, but so too is the potential for collateral damage.