4 ms·
"Isn't this the whole point?" No "It's not until people actually use them and we have the luxury of hindsight that we can say how groundbreaking they might ha
by DannyBee 12y ago
"Isn't this the whole point?"
No
"It's not until people actually use them and we have the luxury of hindsight that we can say how groundbreaking they might have been."
I'm not even sure what to make of this statement.
There have been a lot of history rewrites on why the iPhone succeeded.
If you want to say "we should wait and see", i'm fine with that. If you are saying "i'm sure they are amazing, and we are all just dumb for second guessing apple", this sounds a lot like the emperors new clothes. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Apple had plenty of failures in the past that get glossed over and disappear (remember their social network?). This is true even of hardware (remember the cube? whee) and other major features.
While I doubt they'd get called out over it in the media, it may just disappear the same way a lot of other things did that didn't work out.
So assuming it will be one of the revolutionary devices, despite it seeming like it won't be, is a little too much for me. Happy to be wrong of course (i'd love to buy one if it's truly better), but not going to put faith in them :)
- madeofpalk 12y ago> If you want to say "we should wait and see", i'm fine with that. If you are saying "i'm sure they are amazing, and we are all just dumb for second guessing apple", this sounds a lot like the emperors new clothes. Past performance does not guarantee future results. I'm kind of saying both. Of course, I'm holding off on judging until people actually use it. I know past performance does not guarantee future results, but it's hard not to see a pattern in Apple's products announcements.