3 ms·
I think his point was that having a simple and clean design would make the software easily adoptable. What's wrong with that?
by statictype 17y ago
I think his point was that having a simple and clean design would make the software easily adoptable.
What's wrong with that?
- tptacek 17y agoBecause things should be as simple as they can be, and no simpler. He made a case for simplifying square -> rect -> poly. He made no such case for Twisted, but still tarred them with the same brush.