4 ms·
> Haptic feedback? Agreed, awesome idea, but no reason it can't be on my phone and buzz my leg instead of my wrist. It's frequently lost upon this crowd (I'm g
by jlebar 12y ago
> Haptic feedback? Agreed, awesome idea, but no reason it can't be on my phone and buzz my leg instead of my wrist.
It's frequently lost upon this crowd (I'm guilty of this myself) that half of the population in the West frequently wears clothes which lack pockets.
- UrMomReadsHN 12y agoPhones already do this. My android phone vibrates when I have walking directions on and I need to turn.
- ChristianBundy 12y agoYour statistic confused me until I realized you were [assumedly] referencing females who keep their phones in their purses/bags.
- hayleyanthony 12y agoPlease try to say women, not "females." I don't think you meant anything by it but when you always see that usage, (common in tech spaces) it starts to feel a little dehumanizing.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- dzhiurgis 12y agoa.i. males in medical community?
- wmeredith 12y agoOh lord, get over it. Female is degrading now?
- yusefnapora 12y agoWell, it does make you sound like a Ferengi.
- wmeredith 12y agoWhat's a Ferengi? Edit: Nevermind. I Googled it. Star Trek alien.
- astrange 12y agoThere's plenty of other languages where the words for "female" and "male" are different for people and animals.
- kenrikm 12y agohttp://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=female http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=female From Wikipedia: "It is not etymologically related to the word male, but in the late 14th century the spelling was altered in English to parallel the spelling of male." I honestly don't understand how "female" is any worse then "woman" honest question I'm easily the least sexist person you could run into (ask my wife) but sometimes it seems like no mater what you're still going to offend someone. :(
- jlebar 12y agoI think the issue is that "female" can refer to any species, whereas "woman" refers only to humans. So when someone obliquely refers to women and someone responds "oh, you're talking about females!", the subtext is that they have now realized that we're talking about women, but haven't quite realized that women are people too. It would be the same as calling someone a "human" rather than a "person". Like aliens do in the movies. Maybe you don't feel that's dehumanizing, but I think a lot of people would. (Classicist pet peeve: A word's etymology has nothing to do with its modern denotation and connotation.)
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- astrange 12y agoPersonally, I like to imagine the post is being written by a Ferengi. There's more than sufficient evidence for it.