3 ms·
>At best, "cool" is all it is. It certainly isn't useful. [...] Pictures might be acceptable to your significant other. Isn't useful to you? Personally, I find
by danabramov 12y ago
>At best, "cool" is all it is. It certainly isn't useful. [...] Pictures might be acceptable to your significant other.
Isn't useful to you? Personally, I find this immensely useful. I don't know of any other device to communicate with the significant other in such an intimate way. This is precisely what I wanted. You might understand it better when you're in a relationship but spend a lot of time away from each other. Of course pictures and taps mean much more than texting. Of course it's fun to invent your own sign language. If you don't have a use case for this watch, it doesn't mean it's not “useful”.
- deong 12y agoFunny you should mention it, but I currently live about 10,000 kilometers from my girlfriend. And like I said, it's maybe an OK thing between partners. I think it's a stupid gimmick that would immediately get old even then, but that's it. You should not send a cutesy picture in lieu of an actual message to anyone else.