> This is what I meant. Given a skilled programmer, it's more likely to be a male. That might have been what you meant, but it isn't what you said. You said:

> This is what I meant. Given a skilled programmer, it's more likely to be a male. That might have been what you meant, but it isn't what you said. You said: > Then we can conclude that there are more male programmers that are above this mean. Not as a percentage of their cohort, which is the only rational way of expressing this idea.