3 ms·
You are correct. There is no sign of a vote. That inaccuracy aside, the outline of the general understanding of the licensing situation is a step in the right d
by ryao 12y ago
You are correct. There is no sign of a vote. That inaccuracy aside, the outline of the general understanding of the licensing situation is a step in the right direction. The email itself suggests that there was tentative agreement over this at DebConf 14, which is promising.
- ferrantim 12y agoSorry for introducing that inaccuracy when I posted the title. I mistakenly interpreted "As agreed at DebConf 14, Debian ZFS on Linux Maintainers have concluded..." as the equivalent of a vote.
- _delirium 12y agoMy read was that there was agreement at DebConf 14 among the ZFS-on-Linux maintainers specifically, not necessarily that they'd gotten buy-in from the wider Debian community. It's somewhat unclear though.