2 ms·
> I'd argue that the radioactive waste produced by a fission power plant is better for the environment That's not what I was disputing. The half-life of radioa
by hackerboos 12y ago
> I'd argue that the radioactive waste produced by a fission power plant is better for the environment
That's not what I was disputing. The half-life of radioactive material produced from nuclear power is what makes it's maintenance expensive.
Do you really think maintaining nuclear waste for 24,000 years is cheaper than the 25% added cost for carbon capture?