4 ms·
I agree. You can't even publish negative results, although the data would be incredibly useful to the scientific community. The whole point of science is cons
by Xcelerate 12y ago
I agree. You can't even publish negative results, although the data would be incredibly useful to the scientific community. The whole point of science is consistent replication to aid prediction.
Some rich person needs to start a program incentivizing this kind of work.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- ansgri 12y agoIt seems more likely that some rich person already have duplicated some "key" discoveries and is happily reaping the benefits of knowing what does work, without making much noise of it.