> And if you read the entire comment thread, you'll see that they removed the article precisely because they were unable to come to any real conclusions. The t

> And if you read the entire comment thread, you'll see that they removed the article precisely because they were unable to come to any real conclusions. The thing is, access to private data didn't change the fact that they were using a self-reported stat to begin with. Given that OKC's data was self-reported to a significant degree, it's hard to see why this wasn't taken into account. And then they go on to cite how they already knew it could be 10x higher (or more) by citing OKC data. This leads to the (paraphrased) conclusion that they can't be total frauds because they're still in business.