It's a gut instinct to agree, but I think you underestimate the power of competition. There invariably should be partnerships. But if there was only a single d

It's a gut instinct to agree, but I think you underestimate the power of competition. There invariably should be partnerships. But if there was only a single driverless car solution, what prevents companies from getting complacent? Why aim for more than "good enough?" Why put 100 billion into a project if it won't help you sell more cars than your competitors? Its seems odd that anyone would go with a provably less safe driver less car solution, but perhaps some systems are better at other types of driving than others? At the very least, there has to be legislation that defines a bare minimum (some multiple of human competence or maybe the 1 percentile), but beyond that, competition is more or less necessary.