3 ms·
I do not feel that it is a good idea to further encourage or embed a precedent in this direction. We've had too many cases going in that direction already. I wo
by asuffield 12y ago
I do not feel that it is a good idea to further encourage or embed a precedent in this direction. We've had too many cases going in that direction already. I would far rather see cases establish a precedent that, if no harm is otherwise caused, then the act of confirming a security flaw is not unlawful in its own right.
- atlantic 12y agoMy point is that, for the purposes of justice, the exact same standards should apply to government agents and private individuals in the matter of admissibility of evidence. Meaning that if they want to relax the standard for the government, then security analysts should also benefit.