3 ms·
Um, that's not the definition of "slave". It's not even in the same ballpark as the definition of "slave". This is free advice, so you can take it for what it'
by alexqgb 12y ago
Um, that's not the definition of "slave". It's not even in the same ballpark as the definition of "slave".
This is free advice, so you can take it for what it's worth, but if you've ever found yourself suffering from a limited amount of trust or respect from others, consider that it may be due to your apparently limited respect for the truth. Or basic English.
- jimmaswell 12y agoI think you are the one with deficiency in the language. "Slave" is used in that kind of nonliteral sense all the time. Slave to gas prices, slave to the weather, slave to fashion.