>it means the next person charged under the CFAA for "exceeding authorization" by fuzzing will have a precedent to cite. Unless Ulbricht's lawyers successfully

>it means the next person charged under the CFAA for "exceeding authorization" by fuzzing will have a precedent to cite. Unless Ulbricht's lawyers successfully argue that fuzzing constitutes an illegal search. The law respects precedent, and there is more precedent which finds that fuzzing leads to illegal access.