4 ms·
I think SA has suffered from some of the original core developers (myself included) moving on to other projects in a completely different tech area. The good ne
by baudehlo 12y ago
I think SA has suffered from some of the original core developers (myself included) moving on to other projects in a completely different tech area. The good news is that other projects have taken up some of the mantle, like Haraka, check out the karma plugin. It does some amazing blocking of spam and penalizing clients.
Beyond that also one of the things SA doesn't do well is actually rejecting hard on sensible blacklists like the CBL. We worked hard to make everything heuristic based but it wasn't always the right choice. Some things need to be black and white. There's some code on SA for short circuiting now but it's not really the best solution. In my own spam filtering I have a bunch of hard rejects and they work really well.
Anyway, check out Haraka or Qpsmtpd for solid anti spam mail serving solutions. They work really well.
- patio11 12y agoHey wait, I did vaguely recognize your username from somewhere. Thanks for SpamAssassin! I spent more hours spelunking through your guys' source code and community rulesets than you'd want to know, about a decade ago, while working for the anti-spam group in our R&D department at a tech incubator.
- xorcist 12y agoThank you for SA. I do not share the experience that it is outsmarted, I still achieve > 98% accuracy just as I did ten years ago. That is really a testament to all the hard work of its developers.