4 ms·
> It's pretty straightforward, as ethical dilemmas go. "Excitement" comes nowhere close to justifying breaking your word. Agreed - this is inexcusable. If yo
by chimeracoder 12y ago
> It's pretty straightforward, as ethical dilemmas go. "Excitement" comes nowhere close to justifying breaking your word.
Agreed - this is inexcusable.
If you lose an investment because a later-stage investor is keen on you cheating existing investors out of what you already promised them, I'd say you dodged a bullet - you don't want them owning any piece of your company.
If your later-stage investors are so keen on working with investors who are willing to renege on their promises and legal obligations to earlier investors, that says something about:
(A) The types of entrepreneurs they want to work with
(B) How they themselves can expect to be treated in later rounds, when they are now the "earlier investors".
- btown 12y agoAnd if your Series A investor denies pro-rata rights to your seed round investors, then it should expect to have its pro-rata rights denied in Series B. Which gives this Series A investor a perverse incentive to set up the company to look better in the short term to get it to Series B, rather than it acting in the IPO-timescale long-term interest of your company!