3 ms·
Gentoo is often ridiculed for trying to squeeze more performance by using platform-specific compiler settings, but this misses the point. It is the only distri
by jwr 12y ago
Gentoo is often ridiculed for trying to squeeze more performance by using platform-specific compiler settings, but this misses the point.
It is the only distribution that can deal with the rapidly-changing nature of open-source software. Most open-source libraries are not designed with long-term viability in mind, and are not ready for binary distribution. Distribution makers put a lot of effort into actually making things work in the long term. Gentoo takes a different approach: just assume that you will be recompiling pretty much everything, regularly.
The result is a surprisingly maintainable system. As long as you update it regularly, it won't tell you to perform this monstrous cliffhanger upgrade, or reinstall using a newer version.
Sure, there is always breakage, but Gentoo has a different tradeoff: minor breakage happening more often vs major breakage happening when major releases are done.
- jiggy2011 12y agoThe same could be said for Arch, or any other rolling distro.
- bhaak 12y agoLast weekend I had to do exactly that, taming the monstrous cliffhanger upgrade of my MythTv system that still was running a kernel 2.6.15 and hasn't really seen much change since 2009. I don't think any other distro would have allowed me to upgrade the system without a reinstall. Even though I screwed up because I didn't RTFM and didn't install everything necessary for booting the system with OpenRC, I still could salvage the system by booting with a rescue stick (based on Gentoo of course) and chrooting into my system and fix it this way. Now it's running a current kernel and it is ready for the installation of the new digital receiver card.