> Unless you're citing scientific studies you can not possibly be drawing on your own declared lack of experience. what does "drawing on your own declared lack

> Unless you're citing scientific studies you can not possibly be drawing on your own declared lack of experience. what does "drawing on your own declared lack of experience" even mean? how do you draw on a lack of experience, exactly? is this some sort of allusion to necessity driving invention? also, if he was "citing scientific studies" would he then necessarily be "drawing on his own experience"? aren't the two distinct things? > Nothing here is "called an opinion". You should probably stop using that phrase because it's ridiculous. I'm showing you respect by pointing out that you're wrong. of course it's an opinion, it's very clearly one. it's staggeringly obvious. what is the point of your belligerent idiocy? are you pissing yourself over particular phrasing? > The idea that you would attempt to answer this question based on zero experience is hilarious. That you would take an authoritative tone makes you a bit of an idiot. what's rather amusing in this tirade is that you completely fail to understand the implications of "placebo" in the context of "experience". just because you "experience" something, does not make you an authority, precisely because of (among other things) the placebo effect. it's always amusing when fools cast stones. lol!