4 ms·
I still am very impressed with CoreOS but I find sad that they were forced to move away from their initially touted "only systemd+etcd". (No blame on them, that
by thu 12y ago
I still am very impressed with CoreOS but I find sad that they were forced to move away from their initially touted "only systemd+etcd". (No blame on them, that was expected as the Docker ecosystem is still young and very fast-moving; plenty of interleaved problems must be solved elegantly.) When you say that Docker+etcd is saner that other solutions, I wonder for how long this will remain the case as the field matures.
- fmdud 12y agoWell "Docker + etcd" still needs a surprising amount of tooling around it to be considered a viable production environment. CoreOS provides a lot of this and deis sits atop that. Deis is the best thing I've seen come out of Docker's DevOps gold rush.
- lukebennett 12y ago"Deis is the best thing I've seen come out of Docker's DevOps gold rush." I have to agree - Deis fills a lot of holes, although it still has some way to go.
- tedchs 12y agoWould you be willing to share more about what's in CoreOS that you feel like shouldn't be?