5 ms·
I'm not making "shit up", it's called an opinion and you should respect it. I said "mostly" and I also wrote "There's something about it that is indeed relaxing
by Red_Tarsius 12y ago
I'm not making "shit up", it's called an opinion and you should respect it. I said "mostly" and I also wrote "There's something about it that is indeed relaxing". However:
"Does using it actually enhances focus and creativity?" My answer is a definitive NO, and I described a better alternative. I see people trying it because they believe they'll become creative geniuses and it's just delusional. There's no magic trick for getting more focused and creative except practice and consistency.
- staunch 12y ago> I'm not making "shit up" Yes you are. Unless you're citing scientific studies you can not possibly be drawing on your own declared lack of experience. > it's called an opinion and you should respect it Nothing here is "called an opinion". You should probably stop using that phrase because it's ridiculous. I'm showing you respect by pointing out that you're wrong. If you don't like my choice of words then perhaps you should question your own. > "Does using it actually enhances focus and creativity?" My answer is a definitive NO, and I described a better alternative. The idea that you would attempt to answer this question based on zero experience is hilarious. That you would take an authoritative tone makes you a bit of an idiot.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- hnbro2 12y ago> Unless you're citing scientific studies you can not possibly be drawing on your own declared lack of experience. what does "drawing on your own declared lack of experience" even mean? how do you draw on a lack of experience, exactly? is this some sort of allusion to necessity driving invention? also, if he was "citing scientific studies" would he then necessarily be "drawing on his own experience"? aren't the two distinct things? > Nothing here is "called an opinion". You should probably stop using that phrase because it's ridiculous. I'm showing you respect by pointing out that you're wrong. of course it's an opinion, it's very clearly one. it's staggeringly obvious. what is the point of your belligerent idiocy? are you pissing yourself over particular phrasing? > The idea that you would attempt to answer this question based on zero experience is hilarious. That you would take an authoritative tone makes you a bit of an idiot. what's rather amusing in this tirade is that you completely fail to understand the implications of "placebo" in the context of "experience". just because you "experience" something, does not make you an authority, precisely because of (among other things) the placebo effect. it's always amusing when fools cast stones. lol!
- Red_Tarsius 12y agoNo, you're not showing me any respect. I see I attracted a lot of negative attention. It's not safe to share certain experiences on the Internet, thus the warning at the beginning of the post. I've also seen other people using it and my response is genuine. I don't think that the substance will help the user on the long run and I find meditation a much better alternative.
- staunch 12y agoI'm a virgin but I've seen other people experience problems as a result of sexual relations. I can definitively say sex is NOT worth the trouble! Just meditate guys!
- Red_Tarsius 12y agoYou're associating the pleasure of sex with your argument, while inferring mine as the "not fun" alternative. Please refrain from such car-salesman-tricks. I see you're really just a troll and you're picking on me. If you believe the guy should get incredibly high to get work done, fine. Let him try one way, then the other. Or a mix of both. I won't reply to any other comments.
- staunch 12y agoI'm telling you what I'd tell you in person. That your view point is ridiculous. Probably for your benefit alone. I admit it's hard to see that my tone is not all that serious.