3 ms·
It worked very well on my laptop. Moving between slides felt very natural. Going back, I see that scrolling 'back' (up) didn't work as well. Interesting. I woul
by arjie 12y ago
It worked very well on my laptop. Moving between slides felt very natural. Going back, I see that scrolling 'back' (up) didn't work as well. Interesting. I would never have noticed if your comment didn't make me check.
Why did you think it was broken? It said 'scroll to begin' on my screen so I suppose I knew I was expecting something when I scrolled.
- sparkman55 12y agoWhen I flick my fingers up, I expect a smooth vertical movement of the view pane, exposing new content at the bottom. I can scroll fast and far if I want to scan for interesting content, and scroll backwards if I might have missed something. Every other web page does this, except this one. It subverts the conventional affordance of the scroll wheel / two-finger scroll. The recent NYTimes article about ISIS in the Tigris and Euphrates rivers ( http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/07/03/world/middleeast/syria-iraq-isis-rogue-state-along-two-rivers.html http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/07/03/world/middleea... ) is a much better treatment of the scroll. If I'm going to be subjected to lengthy animations between slides, I generally expect arrows left-and-right to click on. The whole 'scroll to begin' language on an otherwise beautiful page is a usability smell. See http://www.harmoni.ca/blog/affordances http://www.harmoni.ca/blog/affordances
- guiambros 12y agoAlso incredibly similar to Apple's Mac Pro. [1] http://www.apple.com/mac-pro/ http://www.apple.com/mac-pro/