3 ms·

Candy Crush Saga wasn't enough of a clone, apparently. They had the revolutionary idea to use "gems" this time! I really hope that they finally face legal karm

by nnnnni 12y ago

Candy Crush Saga wasn't enough of a clone, apparently. They had the revolutionary idea to use "gems" this time! I really hope that they finally face legal karma as a result of releasing this one.

CJefferson 12y ago
Yes, I hope that the creator of Shariki gets around to suing both pop-cap and King. (Sarcasm filter off - pop-cap copied an earlier game almost exactly)
- nnnnni 12y ago
  You do have a good point there about clones... but is pop-cap sue-happy like King?
  - Adjudicator52 12y ago
    They're owned by EA games now. So you never know...
jaisingh 12y ago
Highly doubt there will be any legal action :/
- MrUnknown 12y ago
  King will more than likely sue anyone making a Bejeweled clone for copying their game.
  - deleted 12y ago
    [deleted]
deleted 12y ago
[deleted]
glenra 12y ago
Candy Crush Saga isn't really a clone. Yes, it uses 3-in-a-row matching as a primary gameplay mechanism, but whereas every level of Bejeweled is the same identical square grid with identical goals, every level of Candy Crush Saga is different. Different board layouts, different goals to complete, different obstacles or special gameplay features. So rather than it being just ONE puzzle game, it's over a thousand distinct puzzle games.