5 ms·

That's a very fair question. The primary reason is the underlying population of borrowers is completely different, so your claim that the risks are much higher

That's a very fair question. The primary reason is the underlying population of borrowers is completely different, so your claim that the risks are much higher on WeFinance is not well founded. Collections agencies on services like Lending Club fail to successfully collect a large share of the time, and when they do collect successfully they still charge a large fee. Borrowers on Lending Club are in general higher risk individuals to begin with for a variety of reasons (which led those debts to have much higher original interest than the WeFinance debts, such as large credit card balances). If WeFinance lenders are many times less likely to default than Lending Club lenders, they would be lower risk even if we didn't help resolve defaults at all. (In practice, we're committed to helping lenders and borrowers resolved problems, and that plus the social ties between lenders and borrowers we believe will help lower defaults in the first place and resolve them effectively when defaults do occur.) We've also individually interviewed each borrower and are confident on the identity verification front, and in fact, for friends-of-friends lending, having 20 Facebook friends in common with someone seems like a pretty good verification to me that they are a legitimate person. Lending club clearly offers higher interest rates. We believe the risks are also much larger and in particular are tough for casual investors to navigate well; this is borne out by the fact that most money invested in Lending Club comes from institutions, not people. We think WeFinance is a great fit for lenders who like higher simplicity and lower risk, and who get some value out of lending to people they are connected to or who have compelling stories.

martey 12y ago
> If WeFinance lenders are many times less likely to default than Lending Club lenders... There is no good way for me to evaluate this claim. If you had a page like https://www.lendingclub.com/info/demand-and-credit-profile.action https://www.lendingclub.com/info/demand-and-credit-profile.a... (or any statistics about current loans) it would help. I haven't signed up for either Lending Club or WeFinance, but it looks like Lending Club gives me significantly more information about the lenders' finances. I would rather see a potential lender's credit report than how I am connected to them on Facebook. > In practice, we're committed to helping lenders and borrowers resolved problems... Your FAQ states that lenders with loans in default should use "conventional legal means" because WeFinance "isn't a party to your contract". If there are other things you do, prospective lenders would probably want to see it. > We've also individually interviewed each borrower and are confident on the identity verification front... I don't know if this means you have exchanged emails with them, had a phone call, or met them in person. I don't know if you are using some third-party service to verify identity, or just verifying that they have a Facebook profile. In an earlier comment, you said that all borrowers have stable jobs and good credit histories, but your FAQ explicitly states that you do not check credit or employment. It's possible that you're assuming that this site will be used by people lending money to people that they already know in real life, in which case most of my concerns above are invalid or irrelevant. I don't think that's clear from your language here or on the website. Even if that's the case, you still might want to: - use SSL to protect the borrower application at http://www.wefinance.co/borrower_interest http://www.wefinance.co/borrower_interest or even the entire site - reconsider the name, since searching for "wefinance" on Google brings up multiple financing companies with the same name.
- mayefsky 12y ago
  Thanks! This is helpful feedback. It's true that our current home page pitch doesn't heavily emphasize the social connections, which does lead to some of the questions you've asked, and we can do better on that. Most lending does indeed come from people you either know in real life or friends-of-friends, and that's how our marketing is typically focused, which is why most people have not expressed too much concern about identity issues and the specific nature of collections arbitration, etc. I am curious--for the types of borrowers we have (typically young with a pretty empty credit history outside of a large student loan), are you interested in seeing the credit report because you think small variations in that number will be meaningful? Or is it more to have more confidence that there's not some huge blemish on it? Part of our hypothesis is that in terms of the former, the range these numbers fall in for these people are not that meaningful to lenders in terms of evaluating risk levels. But it's true that if someone's score was 300 points lower than you expected it to be, that would be worth knowing, and there might be a way to set a minimum credit score or something else private we could do to help build that confidence without simply publishing their whole credit report for the world to see, which some borrowers might resist. We're adding SSL as soon as this batch closes. I'm confident we can get to a decent spot on SEO with a little more growth, but it's certainly possible that won't work and we'll change the name. Thanks again for the thoughts!

martey 12y ago

> If WeFinance lenders are many times less likely to default than Lending Club lenders... There is no good way for me to evaluate this claim. If you had a page like https://www.lendingclub.com/info/demand-and-credit-profile.action https://www.lendingclub.com/info/demand-and-credit-profile.a... (or any statistics about current loans) it would help. I haven't signed up for either Lending Club or WeFinance, but it looks like Lending Club gives me significantly more information about the lenders' finances. I would rather see a potential lender's credit report than how I am connected to them on Facebook. > In practice, we're committed to helping lenders and borrowers resolved problems... Your FAQ states that lenders with loans in default should use "conventional legal means" because WeFinance "isn't a party to your contract". If there are other things you do, prospective lenders would probably want to see it. > We've also individually interviewed each borrower and are confident on the identity verification front... I don't know if this means you have exchanged emails with them, had a phone call, or met them in person. I don't know if you are using some third-party service to verify identity, or just verifying that they have a Facebook profile. In an earlier comment, you said that all borrowers have stable jobs and good credit histories, but your FAQ explicitly states that you do not check credit or employment. It's possible that you're assuming that this site will be used by people lending money to people that they already know in real life, in which case most of my concerns above are invalid or irrelevant. I don't think that's clear from your language here or on the website. Even if that's the case, you still might want to: - use SSL to protect the borrower application at http://www.wefinance.co/borrower_interest http://www.wefinance.co/borrower_interest or even the entire site - reconsider the name, since searching for "wefinance" on Google brings up multiple financing companies with the same name.

mayefsky 12y ago
Thanks! This is helpful feedback. It's true that our current home page pitch doesn't heavily emphasize the social connections, which does lead to some of the questions you've asked, and we can do better on that. Most lending does indeed come from people you either know in real life or friends-of-friends, and that's how our marketing is typically focused, which is why most people have not expressed too much concern about identity issues and the specific nature of collections arbitration, etc. I am curious--for the types of borrowers we have (typically young with a pretty empty credit history outside of a large student loan), are you interested in seeing the credit report because you think small variations in that number will be meaningful? Or is it more to have more confidence that there's not some huge blemish on it? Part of our hypothesis is that in terms of the former, the range these numbers fall in for these people are not that meaningful to lenders in terms of evaluating risk levels. But it's true that if someone's score was 300 points lower than you expected it to be, that would be worth knowing, and there might be a way to set a minimum credit score or something else private we could do to help build that confidence without simply publishing their whole credit report for the world to see, which some borrowers might resist. We're adding SSL as soon as this batch closes. I'm confident we can get to a decent spot on SEO with a little more growth, but it's certainly possible that won't work and we'll change the name. Thanks again for the thoughts!