3 ms·
I think you make an excellent and valid point. On the flip side, developing a spec---for something as popular and accessible as Markdown---out in the open is a
by burntsushi 12y ago
I think you make an excellent and valid point.
On the flip side, developing a spec---for something as popular and accessible as Markdown---out in the open is an extraordinarily difficult task. I think one can definitely make a case for it being the right thing to do (and I mean that in more than just the ethical sense), but I also think one can make a reasonable case for not wanting to travel down that road either. I think it can be so difficult that there would be a very real possibility that it would never get completed.
(I'm sincerely not trying to be combative. I know I'm not really addressing your point---that they didn't even provide a status update---but I just wanted to provide a tiny perspective on the other side of the coin.)
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- canadev 12y agoI definitely see your point of view. Design by committee is enough to wear down the most passionate person. However, maybe they could have said a simple "We're actually working on a spec and two portable implementations (JS, C) based on the original article," and that might have gone a long way to prevent people from wasting their time.
- neves 12y agoBut they tried to contact the guy and never obtained an answer. I'd vote to call it MarkAbove!