3 ms·
I don't know how well genericization applies to this, markdown was a loosely defined specification, intentionally encouraging modification. all the "incompatibl
by RubyPinch 12y ago
I don't know how well genericization applies to this, markdown was a loosely defined specification, intentionally encouraging modification. all the "incompatible" versions of markdown are within what he intended.
further, its just the name of a spec, should the owner of a spec really be expected to continuously hunt down and test/validate every implementation of their specification? that doesn't exactly seem possible in the slightest.
I don't think he would have trademark protections for something like this for other reasons, I do wonder if there is anything similar that applies in this situation
- njr123 12y ago> should the owner of a spec really be expected to continuously hunt down and test/validate every implementation of their specification? I'm pretty sure thats exactly what trademark law says you have to do. You have to defend your trademark. You can't go ten years letting everyone use the Markdown brand where ever they want, and then suddenly decide one day you want to start controlling it.