4 ms·
Bitbucket has had a(n honestly better) version of this functionality for a while. One of the few areas where they beat Github. As for which is better... depend
by thathonkey 12y ago
Bitbucket has had a(n honestly better) version of this functionality for a while. One of the few areas where they beat Github.
As for which is better... depends. That's why it's good to have both on a toggle like so.
- hrjet 12y agoBitbucket has been advancing in many areas. Did a recent evaluation of Github and Bitbucket for an upcoming project. Github's issue management is optimal for small projects. But Bitbucket shines at issue management for large projects: priorities, voting, watching, components, issue workflow. Bitbucket also has a responsive and fluid design that utilizes screen real-estate better. All-in-all, I am seriously considering Bitbucket for larger projects.
- dserodio 12y agoBitbucket's lack of a code search feature is a serious disadvantage, specially for large organizations. The enhancement request has turned into a ranting thread[1] [1] https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issue/2874/ability-to-search-source-code-bb-39 https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issue/2874/ability-to-sear...
- hrjet 12y agoAh, thanks for the link. Hadn't checked for code-searchability. The nice thing is bitbucket has an issue tracker for the site. I am sure Github would have a similar list of pet peeves if it had a way to publicly track feature requests.