5 ms·

Complaining that it refers to the "wrong" football adds nothing to the discussion.

• anigbrowl 12y ago
  There was a whole other paragraph that did.
  • mikeash 12y ago
    Isn't that talking about the other football?
  • bmm6o 12y ago
    I agree, that part of the post at least seemed on-topic. I guess it was collateral damage, maybe there's a lesson to be learned. (Note, I didn't up- or down-vote)
  • thanatropism 12y ago
    (There was an opening joke, and an open-ended technical question. But 'murricans sure be touchy with anything that looks like critique of 'murrican exceptionalism, even in sports.)