3 ms·
I think this is great, I'm all for extending markdown for specific situations but I think the base h1, li, and p tags should be clearly defined. It appears that
by reconbot 12y ago
I think this is great, I'm all for extending markdown for specific situations but I think the base h1, li, and p tags should be clearly defined. It appears that most parsers could adopt most of the spec without breaking backwards compatibility. (I'm probably wrong.)
There's an obvious annoyance with markdown like this, where a lack of a blank line after the headlines causes problems but only in a few parsers. I'm glad to see most of them do the right thing.
http://johnmacfarlane.net/babelmark2/?normalize=1&text=%23+I+love+this+stuff%0A%23%23+A+LOT!%0A-+li+1%0A-+li+2 http://johnmacfarlane.net/babelmark2/?normalize=1&text=%23+I...!