3 ms·
Both frameworks have their strength and weaknesses. I think Ember is a heavier and more verbose,but it's easy to integrate third party widgets without having t
by aikah 12y ago
Both frameworks have their strength and weaknesses. I think Ember is a heavier and more verbose,but it's easy to integrate third party widgets without having to rewrite them.
While I was coding something to learn AngularJS https://github.com/Mparaiso/markme-silex https://github.com/Mparaiso/markme-silex , I spent most of my time fixing race conditions between the digest cycle and the third party widgets , and sometimes it was reaslly hard to figure out why the model wasnt updating,or why the view was when the model didnt change in appearance. ( I had to integrate masonry,bootstrap modal,tags.input,autocomplete and a few others).
But again,since AngularJS takes care of everything else,that's a tradeoff.Angular solves the architecture problem with dependency injection.