4 ms·
This is good post. I suppose you're prepared for downvotes? ;-) >Somehow Europe, Canada, Japan, etc, all make health care work but we can't. The thing is, tha
by deciplex 12y ago
This is good post. I suppose you're prepared for downvotes? ;-)
>Somehow Europe, Canada, Japan, etc, all make health care work but we can't.
The thing is, that's mostly accurate. Those places all have governments that still occasionally get out of bed in the morning and serve the interests of their citizens. America does not. Now, the reason it doesn't in the first place, is mostly due to the actions of the same sort of assholes who would oppose universal healthcare on ideological grounds. So it's rather chicken/egg to be sure, but the fact remains. As P.J. O'Rourke wrote in one of his more self-aware moments (when he was younger, basically), "Republicans insist that government doesn't work, and then they get elected and prove it".
So on the one hand, universal health care is a good thing and Americans should have it. On the other hand, the US government is, at best, barely capable of pulling it off. You praise the ACA, but surely you realize what a piece of shit program it implements? Compared to, as above, Europe, Canada, Japan, et al? It's better than the regime that came before it, probably, but only just barely. It does little to address spiraling costs, for example, which is an enormous problem.
If it's a first step, great. Time will tell.
- djur 12y agoCost control is actually one of the ACA's stronger points, and since it was passed the increase in health costs has been cut by a third. The limited expansion of health care is the main problem with the ACA, but a big part of that can be blamed on the Supreme Court.