2 ms·
MySQL historically had more support for HA/clustering than Postgres. Recently, there's been a lot of progress on integrating Postgres clustering into the core,
by btown 12y ago
MySQL historically had more support for HA/clustering than Postgres. Recently, there's been a lot of progress on integrating Postgres clustering into the core, to the point where it's mature, but perhaps not as battle-tested. Not a reason to choose MySQL for a startup, I think, but if you've got a cluster working on MySQL and a clear understanding of its pitfalls, there's no real reason to switch to Postgres.
- calinet6 12y agoThat makes sense, thanks. I guess as long as you have a reasonably optimized relational database of a given class, you're going to be about on the same order of magnitude of performance.