3 ms·
One of the reasons that there wasn't much in the way of development of larger telescopes in the late 1970s and 1980s was the development of the CCD. Prior to t
by antognini 12y ago
One of the reasons that there wasn't much in the way of development of larger telescopes in the late 1970s and 1980s was the development of the CCD. Prior to the CCD, astronomers used photographic plates to take their images, and photographic plates have horrendous efficiencies. A typical photographic plate will only register a few percent of the incident photons. A CCD, however, has an efficiency very close to 100% (except at really low wavelengths). Almost immediately after its invention, new instruments with CCDs were built to be put on existing telescopes. [1] Because the efficiency was a factor of ~30 larger, it was as though you had quintupled the diameter of your telescope. There wasn't much of a reason, then, to invest in huge new telescopes when you could effectively have a huge new telescope just by building a CCD detector.
Also, as a graduate student at Ohio State I would be remiss if I neglected to mention that the Large Binocular Telescope was originally planned to be built at the same time as Keck. It was originally conceived to be larger and with OSU providing a large fraction of the funding. OSU's president, Gordon Gee, cut funding for the project in the early 90's, however, which threw the project into disarray. Most of the faculty in the Ohio State astronomy department resigned in protest which is why Ohio State has had a department with relatively young faculty. Due to problems funding the project and technical difficulties (putting two very large mirrors on a common mount turned out to be harder than anticipated), the telescope had to be scaled back and it only saw first light in 2005.
[1] As an aside, astronomy has been one of the major drivers of improvements in CCD technology. CCDs in consumer devices are generally used in photon-rich environments and the users can tolerate a lot of noise in their images. Astronomers, however, demand very low noise and use their CCDs in photon-poor environments, and the production of these kinds of devices has required major improvements in CCD technology.
- brave-new 12y agoI have a 130mm (5") Newtonian Reflector telescope, do you have an advice on a good CCD detector to use with it?
- qwerta 12y agoFor start just get webcam and stack images of moon .
- reportingsjr 12y agoIf you have a DSLR you can get pretty good results with that. You will absolutely have to learn how to use a stacking program for great images as qwerta said. If you could afford it you would want a super chilled (80K is common due to LN2 cooling) detector for low noise.
- batbomb 12y agoFor CCD technologies, I work peripherally with the LSST camera group developing and testing the shutter and sensor. The sensor is going to be 3.2GP. Also, the K foundations together (Keck and Kavli) are pretty amazing foundations as far as astronomy and other pure science (especially not commercially beneficial) sciences go.