4 ms·
There is a slight point in founders' favor - sometimes when you need to get out and just get the stuff done, you don't write test for every non-essential piece
by annnnd 12y ago
There is a slight point in founders' favor - sometimes when you need to get out and just get the stuff done, you don't write test for every non-essential piece of code. You also just copy/paste that controller, because you know you will probably throw most of the code away anyway. All you want is to know if the business model works. After all, you are not building core systems for a financial institution. And you know that if it takes off there will be more than enough time to fix stuff properly.
That said, I strongly disagree with not paying your employees fully. If you are a founder, you have an obligation to the people you hire. YOU SHOULD PAY THEM! If you think you should pay them only for a month and a half, fire them on time. In the end, bad match should always be founder's responsibility.
EDIT: HN could really use "Preview" button. :)
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- a_c_s 12y agoFired after 1 month but paid for 1.5 months: seems generous to me.
- annnnd 12y agoDepends on the contract - they agreed on 3 months. The core of the problem is that they didn't hire him for a shorter time (test run) / weren't able to use him for the remaining time.