4 ms·
Theoretically, your are right. But there is no surplus in UberBlack, UberPop, UberX. The surplus, ride sharing, exists only in UberPool. Why? Because the sur
by PinguTS 12y ago
Theoretically, your are right.
But there is no surplus in UberBlack, UberPop, UberX.
The surplus, ride sharing, exists only in UberPool.
Why? Because the surplus, as you argue, is: there is a driver who wants to go from A to B. I need a trip from C to D and it happens, that C and D is along the ride of A to B, or even match with A and B. That is called ride sharing. That is nothing new. This kind of business exists in Germany for years. There are also nice Apps that integrate with your navigations system, like http://flinc.org http://flinc.org
But what Uber offers with Uber{Black|Pop|X} is not a ride sharing. I still want to go from C to D. But there is no driver who wants to go from A to B. There is only a driver who wants to make some money. So the driver may come from A to pick me up at C. But after D, the driver is either going back to A or will pick up another client. This no ride sharing. Without me as the client, the drive would not have taken place in the first place. So there is no surplus.
That is the distinguishing element between business and ride sharing.
- clarkm 12y ago> But there is no surplus in UberBlack, UberPop, UberX. Not true. A lot of UberX drivers use cars that would otherwise be sitting in a garage. It may not be ride sharing, but it's still a type of car sharing.
- jacquesm 12y agoThat surplus was not intended to address the surplus of cars in general. By your argument any parking lot is a surplus that could be used for transportation. Such surpluses are typically addressed in other ways (greenwheels for instance).
- schrodinger 12y agoWhat about the taxi driver driving around with an empty car looking for passengers? Couldn't that count as a surplus?