4 ms·

Here is the actual paper (paywalled) : http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=1900694 http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=1900694 Anyone have access tha

• kdoggy 12y ago
  https://mega.co.nz/#!G4sEBYbT!kIzq_xi4-9zlWsRElqfjzTKUV6-tCm8sgl1rKkGfv18 https://mega.co.nz/#!G4sEBYbT!kIzq_xi4-9zlWsRElqfjzTKUV6-tCm...
  • hendzen 12y ago
    Thanks! Some noteworthy excerpts: - Participants assigned to the low-carbohydrate diet were instructed to maintain an intake of digestible carbohydrate (total carbohydrate minus total fiber) of less than 40 g/d. - The reduction in body weight was significantly greater in the low-carbohydrate group (mean difference in change at 12 months, 3.5 kg; P=0.002) - those on the low-carbohydrate diet had significantly greater proportional reductions in fat mass (mean difference in change at 12 months, 1.5% P=0.011) - those on the low-carbohydrate diet had significantly greater proportional increases in lean mass (mean difference in change at 12 months, 1.7%; P=0.003) - Compared with a low-fat diet, a low-carbohydrate diet resulted in greater improvements in body composition, HDL cholesterol level, ratio of total– HDL cholesterol, triglyceride level, CRP level, and estimated 10-year CHD risk - Dietitians were not blinded to the study hypothesis(!!). To avoid potential differences in dietary counseling due to this, we used specific and detailed scripts for all counseling sessions and trained staff to deliver the scripts without deviation. - The proportion of participants with detectable urinary ketone levels was significantly higher in the low-carbohydrate group than in the low-fat group at 3, 6, and 12 months (data not shown)