3 ms·
I should have made clear what I meant by "sits lower in the water", and I'm responsible for the confusion. Because the boat is a three-dimensional object, and
by lutusp 12y ago
I should have made clear what I meant by "sits lower in the water", and I'm responsible for the confusion.
Because the boat is a three-dimensional object, and because the subsurface part contacts the water in three dimensions, if it is scaled up with all else the same, it should still have the same waterline, but (obviously) its keel is deeper in the water.
> I still can't intuitively convince myself that the waterline would shift when the model scales.
Your instincts are serving you well, and the answer is simple -- I wasn't sufficiently careful in how I described it, and I let an error creep into yesterday's conversation. In fact, a model whose dimensions are held constant but is scaled up, should show the same waterline at all scales.
Again, I apologize for sounding so sure of myself when I wasn't.
- baddox 12y agoOkay, so you were talking about the keel of the larger model being deeper underwater in absolute terms. I suppose that would effect buoyancy, because pressure increases as depth increases. This might be significant enough to warrant adjustments, at least when scaling very large ships down to very small models.