3 ms·
Given that we're speaking hypothetically (Since physics gets in the way) not sure why're saying Netburst would be consuming 500W - as the manufacturing processe
by xchaotic 12y ago
Given that we're speaking hypothetically (Since physics gets in the way) not sure why're saying Netburst would be consuming 500W - as the manufacturing processes shrink so does the power consumption.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- Retric 12y agoLast few die shrinks have done little for power consumption.
- tadfisher 12y agoIt's because they keep shoving those pesky transistors in there.
- Retric 12y agoThere is some advantage, but 32nm Sandy Bridge vs 22 nm Ivy Bridge they take the same 2700K chip from 95W to 77 W. Which seems ok progress, but at the high end: Sandy Bridge: 32 nm Core i7 3820 (4 cores 10 MB cache) @ 3.6 GHz = 130W Ivy Bridge: 22 nm Core i7 4820K (4 cores 10 MB cache) @ 3.7 GHz = 130W So, you gained .1GHz granted their not identical but they have vary similar transistor counts.