4 ms·
I agree this is sad. On the other hand however one needs to consider how much is really lost this way. Given the inefficiency/pointlessness of much of the effo
by Padding 12y ago
I agree this is sad. On the other hand however one needs to consider how much is really lost this way.
Given the inefficiency/pointlessness of much of the effort involved in compulsory education, I'm not sure better teachers would be able to significantly improve the system. We need a structural change here first, and only then start to look around for brigther people. Otherwise, any bright people that may enter the system, will eventually be frustrated, give up, and in the end achieve results (in the field) that are no better than those of the borderline-acceptable teachers.
- VLM 12y agoAnother way to put it, is the problem is located in the area of "Education - Administration" not front line teachers.
- thaumasiotes 12y ago> We need a structural change here first, and only then start to look around for brighter people. If you do things this way, the effectiveness of the current people is likely to suffer (in pretty much any area, not education specifically).