What is not what the author was getting at? It's clear from your comments here--continually scare quoting "frequentist" and "Bayesian"--and your answer on Quora

What is not what the author was getting at? It's clear from your comments here--continually scare quoting "frequentist" and "Bayesian"--and your answer on Quora, that you're contemptuous of this debate, like the author. OP is saying that there's more to frequentist vs Bayesian than simply picking the right tool for the job, which you are both suggesting. It won't be settled in this comments section.