That's a flawed comparison. Firefox takes the Emacs approach. All of Firefox is built of XUL, Javascript, and the gang. Lots of apps expose a C plugin API, m

That's a flawed comparison. Firefox takes the Emacs approach. All of Firefox is built of XUL, Javascript, and the gang. Lots of apps expose a C plugin API, many apps expose some scripting. I don't think the population of apps exposing a comprehensive scripting API that mirrors the internal C structure is that large. Chrome might be better.You can't do whatever you want with Chrome, it has to be published to the scripting interface first. Early versions of Chrome had trouble supporting a lot of common Firefox extensions for this reason.