> It seems like you're confusing Bayes' Theorem with Bayesian statistics. Yes, a tempest in a teapot. Anyone caught using Bayes' name without qualifying the us

> It seems like you're confusing Bayes' Theorem with Bayesian statistics. Yes, a tempest in a teapot. Anyone caught using Bayes' name without qualifying the use is placed in the same position as someone referring to the Victorian Era without mentioning that Victoria wasn't a Victorian. In most cases, it's not worth the digression.