>Wasn't the whole problem with "spying" that there wasn't judicial oversight ? There was judical oversight... the FISC... aka the rubber stamp That is the p

>Wasn't the whole problem with "spying" that there wasn't judicial oversight ? There was judical oversight... the FISC... aka the rubber stamp That is the problem with the judiciary today, they have abandoned their responsibility to be a check on government power and instead take the government at their word and rubber stamp everything unless there some defense (which is often not even allowed as these orders are given ex parte in many cases) proves they should be denied