That link doesn't claim what you claim it claims. It talks about impact, The focus of the paper is on impact, and along the way it counts people (including poo

That link doesn't claim what you claim it claims. It talks about impact, The focus of the paper is on impact, and along the way it counts people (including poor people) with wages between the current minimum wage and a proposed increased minimum wage. I have no idea what you mean by "massive amount of exclusions". That's just raw bigotry now. If so it's bigotry on the part of the BLS and Census. I guess you assert they are lying? If all the statistics (or at least the ones that disagree with you) are lies, there is no point continuing the discussion, since we can't get anywhere.