4 ms·
To be fair, you'll probably have better luck finding people who can compile it if you use pthreads.h vs. threads.h. IIRC glibc doesn't have threads.h implemente
by DSMan195276 12y ago
To be fair, you'll probably have better luck finding people who can compile it if you use pthreads.h vs. threads.h. IIRC glibc doesn't have threads.h implemented, and I don't know of any C standard libraries that do. pthreads is fairly universal even if it's not standard C, and at the very least it's much more universal then threads.h is at the moment.
- justincormack 12y agoMusl libc will have one in the next release it seems. It is the only one I know of.
- jevinskie 12y agoCorrect, I was just going to chime in about this. Musl is very impressive with its compact size, correctness, Drepper-less-ness =P, and speed of implementing new standards. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5952 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5952
- readerrrr 12y agoPelles IDE has full C11 support.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]